POLICE DENY PROVIDING SECURITY COVER FOR IBEZIM AT DISPUTED CHURCH SERVICE IN ANAMBRA

The Nigeria Police Force has denied reports that its officers provided security cover for Archbishop Alexander Ibezim during a disputed church service in Anambra State.

The clarification comes amid an ongoing leadership crisis within the Awka Anglican Diocese, which has sparked disagreements over church authority, administration and the validity of recent decisions involving senior clergy.

The dispute has attracted attention following developments surrounding Ibezim and the appointment of Bishop Samuel Ezeofor to oversee the affairs of the diocese. The disagreement has created tension among church leaders and raised questions about who has the authority to manage the diocese during the period of uncertainty.

The disputed church service reportedly became a subject of public discussion after claims emerged about the presence of security personnel. The police have now rejected allegations that they officially provided security for Ibezim at the event.

The police clarification is significant because security agencies are expected to remain impartial in disputes involving religious organisations. Their primary responsibility is to maintain law and order, protect lives and property, and prevent situations from escalating into violence.

Religious disagreements can become sensitive when questions of leadership, property or institutional authority are involved. In such circumstances, the involvement of security agencies can attract public scrutiny, particularly when competing groups make conflicting claims.

The crisis within the Awka Anglican Diocese remains a matter of concern for members of the church and the wider community. Observers will be watching to see whether the parties involved can resolve their differences through established church procedures and the appropriate legal channels.

For now, the police have distanced themselves from claims that they provided security cover for Ibezim during the disputed service. Further clarification from the parties involved may help establish the circumstances surrounding the event and prevent additional misunderstandings.

The development underscores the importance of resolving disputes peacefully while ensuring that security agencies maintain neutrality in religious and institutional disagreements.