A heated disagreement between lawyers has delayed the bail hearing of Justice Crack, just as proceedings were set to begin in court.

The matter could not proceed on Thursday as defence and prosecution counsel clashed over legal procedures and presentation of documents. The judge was forced to adjourn the hearing to a later date to allow both sides to resolve their differences.

Justice Crack, who is facing charges, had been expected in court for arguments on his bail application. His legal team and the prosecution could not agree on key issues, leading to raised voices and an inability to move the case forward.

Court sources say the disagreement centred around the admissibility of certain documents and the order of proceedings. Such disputes are not uncommon in high-profile cases, but they often cause frustration for all parties involved, including the defendant.

The case has now been adjourned. A new date for the bail hearing is expected to be fixed soon. Justice Crack remains in custody pending the outcome of the bail application.

This latest delay adds to the slow pace of the trial, which has already drawn public attention. Many are watching to see how the matter will be resolved in the coming weeks.

Both legal teams are expected to use the adjournment period to prepare their arguments more thoroughly and avoid further disruptions when the case returns to court.