DIRI FAULTS REALIGNMENT OF LAGOS-CALABAR COASTAL HIGHWAY

Bayelsa State Governor Douye Diri has criticised the realignment of the Lagos-Calabar Coastal Highway, raising concerns about the changes to the major infrastructure project and their implications for affected communities and states.

The highway is one of the Federal Government’s major road projects, designed to connect coastal areas across southern Nigeria and improve transportation links between states. The project is expected to support trade, tourism and economic activity by making it easier to move people and goods along the coastline.

However, changes to the highway’s alignment can generate concerns over which communities benefit from the route, how land is acquired and whether the revised plans adequately address the interests of affected states and residents.

For Bayelsa and other coastal communities, major infrastructure projects can have significant economic and environmental implications. Road development may improve access to markets and public services, but it can also affect settlements, livelihoods and sensitive ecosystems if planning and implementation are not properly managed.

Diri’s criticism brings attention to the need for consultation and transparency when decisions are made about projects that cross multiple states. State governments and affected communities may seek clarity on route changes, compensation arrangements, environmental safeguards and the distribution of economic benefits.

The coastal highway could create opportunities for businesses by improving connections between commercial centres, ports and tourism destinations. However, the project's long-term value will depend on sound planning, effective construction and careful management of environmental and social impacts.

The Federal Government and other relevant authorities will need to address concerns about the realignment and provide clear information on the reasons behind any changes. Engagement with affected stakeholders could help reduce disputes and build public confidence in the project.

Ultimately, the debate highlights the importance of ensuring that major national infrastructure projects deliver broad economic benefits while treating affected communities fairly and protecting the environment.